Dear Prof. Dr. Zimmerman, a long time ago I was your "strategy book " reviewed. For this I now want to ask some questions.
Helga King : men were trained in all the centuries in strategic thinking. Were they therefore an advantage over women?
Prof. Dr. Zimmermann : men were certainly better trained in specific strategies, for example in the military or in business, have but no educational advantage in the general and universal strategic thinking. Competitive strategies may affect male and warlike, are perceived as teaching strategies, perhaps more feminine, but I see no room for gender differences within the strategy.
Helga King : If strategic thinking in all its facets, each is accessible, then it logically brings no benefits. What this means for people who want to continue to be particularly successful?
Prof. Dr. Zimmermann : no competitive advantage lasts forever. The more educated and creative, the general strategic level, the more demanding, competition.
Helga King : Are Bluff and taboo the real strategies for success in advertising?
Prof. Dr. Zimmermann : They are often used but also provocation, self-similarity, anthropomorphic and news value are popular patterns of action in advertising.
Helga King : If you want to impose authoritarian people successful in its goals, then the appeasement most useful?
Prof. Dr. Zimmermann : Probably not. Sir Neville Chamberlain is with this strategy compared to Hitler's Germany, a very authoritarian state has failed clear. I would first ask whether these goals with or against the authoritarian People need to be enforced. A strategy game like Tit for Tat could be particularly suitable.
Helga King : Can you give me an example, left behind in the strategy of divide and rule "no long-term frustration of scorched earth and environment?
Prof. Dr. Zimmermann : Otto von Bismarck's alliance policy. His arrangement that "require all the powers except France and our coalitions against us by their relationships to each other" to be held, Germany and Europe has given 50 years of peace.
Helga King : Are people who take the "divide and conquer" strategy Applying basically weak Maten?
Prof. Dr. Zimmermann : Not at all. Divide and rule is also a wonderful analysis strategy with which I can separate parts of complex problems and solve succession. The limits of his own claim to power to detect I oppose intelligent.
Helga King : How can you recognize the strategy of the secondary theater of war the most?
Prof. Dr. Zimmermann : It's best not, unless the minor theaters of war are well chosen, neither too far-fetched nor far away from the center of the action. If you can see it, there was no strategy.
Helga King : How do you know that someone pretends to know more than he knows. How to behave towards the on-the-bush-beater? With bluff?
Prof. Dr. Zimmermann : the bluffer is unmasked best with the patterns of action "hug". Sun Tsu says, "embrace your enemy, he can not move." In addition, the proximity granted to someone who distrusts you, the best observation situation.
Helga King : The Strategy deterrence is a game with fear. What if the opponent is free of fear?
Prof. Dr. Zimmermann : deterrence does not work on fear but on the calculation of the probability of sanctions. Even though I'm not afraid of sanctions, however, they reduce my benefits yield. Strategy has nothing to do with emotions, it's about value, I can calculate.
Helga King: As you can see the strategy of molting? Does it lead to better results than one that relies on threats, etc.?
Prof. Dr. Zimmermann : molting is a weak strategy to limit damage in the sense added. Whoever is selected, not in a position of strength and can no longer threaten. Package answers in the sense that a strategy is more successful than the other, there can not, because it depends on the context.
Dear Prof. Dr. Zimmermann, thank you for the enlightening interview.
Helga King
Helga King : men were trained in all the centuries in strategic thinking. Were they therefore an advantage over women?
 |
| Prof. Dr. Zimmermann |
Helga King : If strategic thinking in all its facets, each is accessible, then it logically brings no benefits. What this means for people who want to continue to be particularly successful?
Prof. Dr. Zimmermann : no competitive advantage lasts forever. The more educated and creative, the general strategic level, the more demanding, competition.
Helga King : Are Bluff and taboo the real strategies for success in advertising?
Prof. Dr. Zimmermann : They are often used but also provocation, self-similarity, anthropomorphic and news value are popular patterns of action in advertising.
 |
| Helga King |
Prof. Dr. Zimmermann : Probably not. Sir Neville Chamberlain is with this strategy compared to Hitler's Germany, a very authoritarian state has failed clear. I would first ask whether these goals with or against the authoritarian People need to be enforced. A strategy game like Tit for Tat could be particularly suitable.
Helga King : Can you give me an example, left behind in the strategy of divide and rule "no long-term frustration of scorched earth and environment?
Prof. Dr. Zimmermann : Otto von Bismarck's alliance policy. His arrangement that "require all the powers except France and our coalitions against us by their relationships to each other" to be held, Germany and Europe has given 50 years of peace.
Helga King : Are people who take the "divide and conquer" strategy Applying basically weak Maten?
Prof. Dr. Zimmermann : Not at all. Divide and rule is also a wonderful analysis strategy with which I can separate parts of complex problems and solve succession. The limits of his own claim to power to detect I oppose intelligent.
Helga King : How can you recognize the strategy of the secondary theater of war the most?
Prof. Dr. Zimmermann : It's best not, unless the minor theaters of war are well chosen, neither too far-fetched nor far away from the center of the action. If you can see it, there was no strategy.
Helga King : How do you know that someone pretends to know more than he knows. How to behave towards the on-the-bush-beater? With bluff?
 |
| Prof. Dr. Zimmermann |
Helga King : The Strategy deterrence is a game with fear. What if the opponent is free of fear?
Prof. Dr. Zimmermann : deterrence does not work on fear but on the calculation of the probability of sanctions. Even though I'm not afraid of sanctions, however, they reduce my benefits yield. Strategy has nothing to do with emotions, it's about value, I can calculate.
Helga King: As you can see the strategy of molting? Does it lead to better results than one that relies on threats, etc.?
Prof. Dr. Zimmermann : molting is a weak strategy to limit damage in the sense added. Whoever is selected, not in a position of strength and can no longer threaten. Package answers in the sense that a strategy is more successful than the other, there can not, because it depends on the context.
Dear Prof. Dr. Zimmermann, thank you for the enlightening interview.
Helga King
0 comments:
Post a Comment